clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Supes Take A(nother) Stand Against GGNRA Dog Policy

New, 1 comment

Remember how the Golden Gate National Recreation Area wants to have a new dog management policy that limits where dogs can go without a leash? And the Board of Supervisors were totally against it? Well, the GGNRA has gone through their very lengthy environmental review over the plan, during which the public response was overwhelmingly negative. In response, GGNRA issued a revised Supplemental Dog Management Plan, but the Supes don't think the changes were major enough. They're peeved that GGNRA didn't analyze the effects limiting access would have on the other dog parks in the city, and are throwing around language from when the City transferred land to GGNRA back in the 1970s there was a stipulation that the parkland would be "reserved in perpetuity for recreation or park purposes." Public comment on the Supplemental Dog Management Plan wraps up on January 11, so whether you agree or disagree with the Supes let your opinion be known - comments are accepted online or at the open house at Fort Mason on November 2.
· Draft Dog Management Plan/SEIS [GGNRA]
· Opposing Golden Gate National Recreation Area's Draft Dog Walking Access Policy [SF BOS]
· Previous Coverage of GGNRA Dog Management Plan [Curbed SF]

Fort Mason

100 Marina Boulevard, San Francisco, CA 94123 415 345 7500

Fort Funston

500 Skyline Boulevard, San Francisco, CA 94132

Ocean Beach

1000 Great Highway, San Francisco, CA 94121